From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

The City of N.Y. v. Consol. Tel. and Electrical Subway

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 18, 1922
135 N.E. 923 (N.Y. 1922)

Opinion

Argued March 14, 1922

Decided April 18, 1922

John P. O'Brien, Corporation Counsel ( John F. O'Brien and Willard S. Allen of counsel), for plaintiff, appellant and respondent.

William N. Cohen, Henry J. Hemmens and Thomas H. Beardsley for defendant, respondent and appellant.

Edward L. Blackman and Charles T. Russell for Empire City Subway Company, amicus curiæ.


Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: HISCOCK, Ch. J., HOGAN, CARDOZO, POUND, McLAUGHLIN, CRANE and ANDREWS, JJ.


Summaries of

The City of N.Y. v. Consol. Tel. and Electrical Subway

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 18, 1922
135 N.E. 923 (N.Y. 1922)
Case details for

The City of N.Y. v. Consol. Tel. and Electrical Subway

Case Details

Full title:THE CITY OF NEW YORK, Appellant and Respondent, v . CONSOLIDATED TELEGRAPH…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Apr 18, 1922

Citations

135 N.E. 923 (N.Y. 1922)
135 N.E. 923

Citing Cases

City of New York v. Consol. Tel. and Electrical Subway

Motion to amend remittitur granted, without costs, return of remittitur requested and same ordered to be…