From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

The City of New York v. Hearst

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 30, 1917
117 N.E. 1064 (N.Y. 1917)

Opinion

Argued October 11, 1917

Decided October 30, 1917

Louis Marshall, Samuel Untermyer and William A. de Ford for appellant.

Lamar Hardy, Corporation Counsel ( Terence Farley, William E.C. Mayer and Leon N. Futter of counsel), for respondent.


Judgment affirmed, with costs, on opinion of SCOTT, J., in City of New York v. Hearst ( 142 App. Div. 343).

Concur: HISCOCK, Ch. J., CHASE, CUDDEBACK, HOGAN, POUND and ANDREWS, JJ. Not sitting: McLAUGHLIN, J.


Summaries of

The City of New York v. Hearst

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 30, 1917
117 N.E. 1064 (N.Y. 1917)
Case details for

The City of New York v. Hearst

Case Details

Full title:THE CITY OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v . WILLIAM R. HEARST, as President of…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Oct 30, 1917

Citations

117 N.E. 1064 (N.Y. 1917)
117 N.E. 1064

Citing Cases

Matter of Stupack

In view of this authoritative declaration, which is, indeed, wholly applicable on the uncontroverted…

Betor v. City of Albany

The city was liable for permitting O'Neill's wrong to continue. Therefore, O'Neill would be liable over to…