From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

The Board of Commissioners v. Floyd

Supreme Court of South Carolina
Jun 13, 1994
(S.C. Jun. 13, 1994)

Opinion

June 13, 1994.


This matter is before the Court by consent of the parties asking for an Order temporarily suspending the license of the Respondent, David L. Floyd, pursuant to § 7 of the Rule on Disciplinary Procedure, Rule 413, SCACR.

It appears that the consent to be temporarily suspended from the practice of law should be accepted. This acceptance and order is without prejudice to any final proceeding or order which may arise out of this matter, and is without prejudice to Respondent's right to petition to be placed on disability inactive status.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Respondent's license to practice law is temporarily suspended until further order of this Court.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order be filed and served, and, in accordance with § 7(B) of the Rule on Disciplinary Procedure, said Order shall be made public.

I SO MOVE:

James G. Bogle, Jr. Assistant Attorney General Attorney for the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline

WE CONSENT:

David L. Floyd, Respondent

John P. Freeman, Attorney for Respondent

Columbia, South Carolina


Summaries of

The Board of Commissioners v. Floyd

Supreme Court of South Carolina
Jun 13, 1994
(S.C. Jun. 13, 1994)
Case details for

The Board of Commissioners v. Floyd

Case Details

Full title:THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS ON GRIEVANCES AND DISCIPLINE OF SOUTH CAROLINA…

Court:Supreme Court of South Carolina

Date published: Jun 13, 1994

Citations

(S.C. Jun. 13, 1994)