Opinion
Argued May 20, 1947 —
Decided September 12, 1947.
On appeal from the Supreme Court.
For the relators-respondents, Hannoch Lasser ( Herbert J. Hannoch and Morris Weinstein, of counsel).
For the respondents-appellants, Thomas L. Parsonnet ( Joseph A. Ward, of counsel).
This case is controlled by our decision to-day in the case of Brown v. Murphy, 136 N.J.L. 183 .
The only distinction is that the city, in this case, pursuant to statutory authority ( R.S. 40:179-34), established and constructed a seaport and industrial terminal and the lands of the respondents were incorporated therein, and that the city was given the power to condemn by R.S. 40:179-34.
The judgment under appeal is affirmed.
For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, BODINE, DONGES, COLIE, WACHENFELD, EASTWOOD, BURLING, WELLS, DILL, FREUND, McGEEHAN, McLEAN, JJ. 12.
For reversal — None.