From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Thayer v. Howard

United States District Court, District of Kansas
Jun 3, 2024
No. 22-3086-DDC (D. Kan. Jun. 3, 2024)

Opinion

22-3086-DDC

06-03-2024

DAVID W. THAYER, Plaintiff, v. LAURA HOWARD, HALEIGH BENNETT, JEFF BROWN, LESIA DIPMAN, and LINDA KIDD, Defendants.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

Daniel D. Crabtree United States District Judge

This Order strikes plaintiff's Amended Complaint (Doc. 60). Plaintiff filed an Amended Complaint after the court had entered Judgment (Doc. 59). But “once judgment is entered, the filing of an amended complaint is not permissible until judgment is set aside or vacated pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e) or 60(b).” The Tool Box, Inc. v. Ogden City Corp., 419 F.3d 1084, 1087 (10th Cir. 2005) (quotation cleaned up). The court hasn't set aside or vacated the judgment in this case. So, plaintiff's filing of an amended complaint at this stage isn't permitted. The court thus strikes plaintiff's Amended Complaint (Doc. 60).

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED BY THE COURT THAT plaintiff's Amended Complaint (Doc. 60) is struck.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Thayer v. Howard

United States District Court, District of Kansas
Jun 3, 2024
No. 22-3086-DDC (D. Kan. Jun. 3, 2024)
Case details for

Thayer v. Howard

Case Details

Full title:DAVID W. THAYER, Plaintiff, v. LAURA HOWARD, HALEIGH BENNETT, JEFF BROWN…

Court:United States District Court, District of Kansas

Date published: Jun 3, 2024

Citations

No. 22-3086-DDC (D. Kan. Jun. 3, 2024)