Opinion
No. 04-70829.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a)(2).
Filed October 23, 2007.
Markandu S. Vigneswaran, Law Offices of Markandu S. Vigneswaran, Hacienda Heights, CA, for Petitioner.
CAC-District Counsel, Esq., Office of the District Counsel Department of Home-land Security, Thomas K. Buck, Esq., USLA-Office of the U.S. Attorney Civil Tax Divisions, Los Angeles, CA, Ronald E. Lefevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. Agency No. A95-640-540.
Before: KOZINSKI, TASHIMA and McKEOWN, Circuit Judges.
MEMORANDUM
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The reasons articulated by the IJ don't support the adverse credibility finding. 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(4)(B). However, doubts about petitioner's credibility have been raised. See Hartooni v. INS, 21 F.3d 336, 343 (9th Cir. 1994). We therefore remand for the agency to reconsider its adverse credibility finding and petitioner's other claims. See Garrovillas v. INS, 156 F.3d 1010, 1016 (9th Cir. 1998).