From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Thames v. State

Court of Appeals of Alabama
Aug 31, 1926
109 So. 926 (Ala. Crim. App. 1926)

Opinion

4 Div. 101.

June 29, 1926. Rehearing Denied August 31, 1926.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Coffee County; W. L. Parks, Judge.

W. W. Sanders, of Elba, for appellant.

Harwell G. Davis, Atty. Gen., and Chas. H. Brown, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.


Defendant was indicted and convicted of disturbing religious worship, and appeals. The evidence for the state tends to prove the charge as laid in the indictment. The policy of the law is to protect people gathered for religious worship from disturbances that interfere with the services. We find no error in this record that would justify a reversal of this case. Let the judgment be affirmed.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Thames v. State

Court of Appeals of Alabama
Aug 31, 1926
109 So. 926 (Ala. Crim. App. 1926)
Case details for

Thames v. State

Case Details

Full title:Joe THAMES v. STATE

Court:Court of Appeals of Alabama

Date published: Aug 31, 1926

Citations

109 So. 926 (Ala. Crim. App. 1926)
21 Ala. App. 698