From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Thames v. Miller

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Oct 21, 2009
334 F. App'x 136 (9th Cir. 2009)

Opinion

No. 07-16061.

Submitted July 29, 2009.

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a)(2).

Filed October 21, 2009.

Joseph R. Thames, Kailua, HI, pro se.

Deborah Y. Miller, Kailua, HI, pro se.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Hawaii, David A. Ezra, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CV-04-00644-DAE.

Before: BEEZER, HALL and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges.



MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.


Plaintiff Joseph R. Thames appeals pro se from the district court's final judgment denying his claims for breach of contract and breach of the duty of good faith and fair dealing. We have jurisdiction un4er 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We affirm.

The facts of the case are known to the parties and we do not repeat them here.

Because Thames does not present any arguments challenging the district court's denial of his clairns for breach of contract and breach of the duty of good faith and fair dealing, Thames has waived appellate review. See Doty v. County of Lassen, 37 F.3d 540, 548 (9th Cir. 1994).

We grant Thames' motion to amend his opening brief.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Thames v. Miller

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Oct 21, 2009
334 F. App'x 136 (9th Cir. 2009)
Case details for

Thames v. Miller

Case Details

Full title:Joseph R. THAMES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Deborah Y. MILLER…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Oct 21, 2009

Citations

334 F. App'x 136 (9th Cir. 2009)