Opinion
October 8, 1951.
In an action for a partnership accounting, plaintiff appeals from an order denying his motion to declare all proceedings had in the action null and void on the ground that respondents' attorney, a librarian, consultation and opinion clerk in the County Court of Kings County was prohibited by section 473 Jud. of the Judiciary Law from practicing as an attorney in any court of this State. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. The position of respondents' attorney is not included in the enumeration of those whose occupants are prohibited from practicing in any court. By regulation of the Judges of the County Court he is prohibited from practice in that court only. Carswell, Acting P.J., Adel, Sneed, Wenzel and MacCrate, JJ., concur.