See, e.g., United States v. Alvarado, No. 6:13-CV-452-ORL-31, 2013 WL 2311281, at *2 (M.D. Fla. May 30, 2013). United States v. Mastrapa, No. 6:13-CV-882-ORL-36, 2013 WL 5230611, at *2 (M.D. Fla. Sept. 16, 2013); Stewart v. Sterling Tech. Solutions, LLC, No. 6:10-CV-630-ORL-28, 2012 WL 2680198, at *5 (M.D. Fla. June 12, 2012) report and recommendation adopted, No. 6:10-CV-630-ORL-28, 2012 WL 2680548 (M.D. Fla. July 6, 2012); Textron Fin. Corp. v. Longstreet, No. 6:09-CV-1210ORL28DAB, 2010 WL 331901, at *3 (M.D. Fla. Jan. 28, 2010). II. DISCUSSION
00 would not be reasonable." Id. (citing Textron Fin. Corp. v. Longstreet, 2010 WL 331901, at *4 (M.D. Fla. Jan. 28, 2010) (Antoon, J.) (holding that attorneys' fees should be limited to $ 10,000 in a simple contract dispute where the plaintiff failed to provide the court with an itemization of the tasks performed)). It therefore awarded Wells Fargo $ 10,000 in legal fees and $ 2,715.02 in expenses. A similar approach is warranted in this case.
00 would not be reasonable." Id. (citing Textron Fin. Corp. v. Longstreet, 2010 WL 331901, at *4 (M.D. Fla. Jan. 28, 2010) (Antoon, J.) (holding that attorneys' fees should be limited to $ 10,000 in a simple contract dispute where the plaintiff failed to provide the court with an itemization of the tasks performed)). It therefore awarded Wells Fargo $ 10,000 in legal fees and $ 2,715.02 in expenses. A similar approach is warranted in this case.