From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Texas v. Searcy

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Oct 5, 2015
Civil Action No. 3:15-cv-02668-O (N.D. Tex. Oct. 5, 2015)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 3:15-cv-02668-O

10-05-2015

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Plaintiff, v. HARVEY LEELANE SEARCY, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS , CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The United States Magistrate Judge made findings, conclusions, and a recommendation in this case on September 4, 2015. See ECF No. 11. No objections were filed. The District Court reviewed the proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation for plain error. Finding none, the Court ACCEPTS the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge are accepted, and this action is hereby REMANDED to the Ellis County Court of Law No. 2

SO ORDERED on this 5th day of October, 2015.

/s/ _________

Reed O'Connor

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Texas v. Searcy

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Oct 5, 2015
Civil Action No. 3:15-cv-02668-O (N.D. Tex. Oct. 5, 2015)
Case details for

Texas v. Searcy

Case Details

Full title:THE STATE OF TEXAS, Plaintiff, v. HARVEY LEELANE SEARCY, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

Date published: Oct 5, 2015

Citations

Civil Action No. 3:15-cv-02668-O (N.D. Tex. Oct. 5, 2015)

Citing Cases

Texas v. Burgess

In the Fifth Circuit, magistrate judges may recommend remand of removed cases referred by the District Judge…