From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

TEXAS SEED FLORAL v. CHICAGO SET SEED

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, Texarkana
May 27, 1915
178 S.W. 731 (Tex. Civ. App. 1915)

Opinion

No. 1457.

May 21, 1915. Rehearing Denied May 27, 1915.

Appeal from District Court, Dallas County; J. C. Roberts, Judge.

Action between the Texas Seed Floral Company against the Chicago Set Seed Company. Judgment for the latter, and the former appeals. Dismissed.

Short Feild, of Dallas, for appellant. Thompson, Knight, Baker Harris, of Dallas, for appellee.


The appeal is from a judgment rendered February 18, 1914, by a district (the sixty-eighth) court of Dallas county, at a term thereof which, as authorized by law (article 30, subd. 68, Vernon's Statutes), continued more than eight weeks, to wit, from the first Monday in February to May 2, 1914. Notice of the appeal was given April 28, 1914, when appellant's motion for a new trial was overruled. As appellants principal office was in Dallas county, it must, to confer jurisdiction of the appeal on this court, have filed an appeal bond with the clerk of the court below within 20 days after it gave the notice. Article 2084, Vernon's Statutes. This it did not do. The bond was not filed until May 19, 1914. Therefore the appeal must be dismissed because this court is without jurisdiction to hear and determine it. Dilworth v. Steves, 174 S.W. 279; Bank v. Carper, 28 Tex. Civ. App. 334, 67 S.W. 188; Hillman v. Galligher, 52 Tex. Civ. App. 41, 113 S.W. 321; Mara v. Branch (Civ.App.) 127 S.W. 1076; Block v. Largent (Civ.App.) 127 S.W. 1076; Railway Co. v. Leach (Civ.App.) 129 S.W. 399.


Summaries of

TEXAS SEED FLORAL v. CHICAGO SET SEED

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, Texarkana
May 27, 1915
178 S.W. 731 (Tex. Civ. App. 1915)
Case details for

TEXAS SEED FLORAL v. CHICAGO SET SEED

Case Details

Full title:TEXAS SEED FLORAL CO. v. CHICAGO SET SEED CO

Court:Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, Texarkana

Date published: May 27, 1915

Citations

178 S.W. 731 (Tex. Civ. App. 1915)

Citing Cases

Yount v. Fagin

Some of the defendants did not reside in Jefferson county. Therefore, under the law (R.S. art. 2084),…