From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Texas Osage Co-op. Royalty Pool v. Clark

Supreme Court of Texas
Apr 15, 1959
322 S.W.2d 506 (Tex. 1959)

Summary

explaining the designation writ refused, no reversible error

Summary of this case from Tanknology/NDE Corp. v. Bowyer

Opinion

No. A-6957.

February 18, 1959. Rehearing Denied April 15, 1959.

Appeal from the District Court, Lamb County, E. A. Bills, J.

House, Mercer House, San Antonio, for petitioners.

Boone Kirby, Littlefield, for respondent.


The opinion of the Court of Civil Appeals in this case is found in Tex.Civ.App., 314 S.W.2d 109.

In its opinion the Court of Civil Appeals has held that the quoted language contained in the deed from Emil Zoch and wife, Lydia Zoch, to T. Fred Evins, et al., trustees, dated September 9, 1930 ( 314 S.W.2d 111), under which petitioners claim title did not give respondent, Van Clark, notice of petitioners' claim of title to an interest in the minerals in the Southeast Quarter (SE1/4) of Section No. 42 in Block 1, R. M. Thompson original grantee. We are not satisfied that the opinion in that respect has correctly declared the law. We are satisfied, however, that the application for writ of error filed herein presents no error which requires reversal of the judgment of the Court of Civil Appeals. Accordingly, the application for writ of error is 'Refused. No Reversible Error.' Rule 483, Texas Rules of Civil Procedure.


Summaries of

Texas Osage Co-op. Royalty Pool v. Clark

Supreme Court of Texas
Apr 15, 1959
322 S.W.2d 506 (Tex. 1959)

explaining the designation writ refused, no reversible error

Summary of this case from Tanknology/NDE Corp. v. Bowyer
Case details for

Texas Osage Co-op. Royalty Pool v. Clark

Case Details

Full title:TEXAS OSAGE COOPERATIVE ROYALTY POOL, et al., Petitioners, v. Van CLARK…

Court:Supreme Court of Texas

Date published: Apr 15, 1959

Citations

322 S.W.2d 506 (Tex. 1959)

Citing Cases

Tanknology/NDE Corp. v. Bowyer

The fact that the Supreme Court in Grissom quotes this portion from Harris does not mean that it has adopted…

Rheem Acceptance Corp. v. Rowe

In their brief appellees have relied heavily upon the case of Texas Osage Cooperative Royalty Pool v. Clark,…