From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Texas N. O. R. Co. v. Brook

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, Beaumont
May 3, 1939
127 S.W.2d 603 (Tex. Civ. App. 1939)

Opinion

No. 3441.

April 28, 1939. Rehearing Denied May 3, 1939.

Appeal from District Court, Shelby County; T. O. Davis, Judge.

Action by W. H. Brook against the Texas New Orleans Railroad Company for death of plaintiff's minor son Jack Brook. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals.

Judgment affirmed on condition of remittitur.

Baker, Botts, Andrews Wharton, of Houston, Sanders McLeroy, of Center, and Roy L. Arterbury, of Houston, for appellant.

Davis, Avery Wallace, of Center, and Jones Jones, of Marshall, for appellee. O'QUINN, Justice.


New Orleans Railroad Company v. Louise Brook, By Next Friend, Tex. Civ. App. 127 S.W.2d 599, this day decided. The facts are the same, and the questions identical, except in this case, the excessiveness of the verdict is presented. On the authority of the decision and opinion in that case (here referred to and adopted as part of this opinion) the judgment of the trial court as to liability of appellant for damages is affirmed.

The jury, on the evidence, found damages for appellee on account of the loss of his minor son, Jack Brook, in the sum of $12,500. After careful consideration of the evidence, we have concluded that the judgment is excessive in the sum of $5,000. Therefore, if appellee will within thirty days from this date remit that sum, $5,000, from the judgment, leaving the judgment and sum to be received by appellee $7,500, the judgment is affirmed, otherwise it will be reversed and remanded.

The judgment is affirmed conditionally.


Summaries of

Texas N. O. R. Co. v. Brook

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, Beaumont
May 3, 1939
127 S.W.2d 603 (Tex. Civ. App. 1939)
Case details for

Texas N. O. R. Co. v. Brook

Case Details

Full title:TEXAS N. O. R. CO. v. BROOK

Court:Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, Beaumont

Date published: May 3, 1939

Citations

127 S.W.2d 603 (Tex. Civ. App. 1939)