From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Texaco, Inc. v. Gerber

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 30, 1987
128 A.D.2d 864 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)

Opinion

March 30, 1987

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Luciano, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Special Term properly permitted the service of the proposed supplemental verified answer as modified by that court. Leave to supplement pleadings should be freely granted (see, CPLR 3025 [b]) "unless the amendment sought is palpably improper or insufficient as a matter of law or unless prejudice or surprise directly results from delay in seeking such amendment" (see, Barnes v. County of Nassau, 108 A.D.2d 50, 52).

The proposed supplemental answer, in its modified form, was not clearly meritless so as to warrant its rejection; nor was any prejudice alleged as a result in the delay in the service of the pleading. Lawrence, J.P., Eiber, Kunzeman and Sullivan, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Texaco, Inc. v. Gerber

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 30, 1987
128 A.D.2d 864 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)
Case details for

Texaco, Inc. v. Gerber

Case Details

Full title:TEXACO, INC., Appellant, v. ANDREW A. GERBER, JR., Respondent, et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 30, 1987

Citations

128 A.D.2d 864 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)

Citing Cases

Sporn v. Sun Refining Marketing Company

But in light of the plaintiffs' sworn allegations which support the claim that the defendant Sun negligently…

Atherton v. 21 East 92nd Street Corp.

The pleadings, however, give sufficient notice of the hazardous state of the premises to adequately apprise…