Opinion
Appellate case number: 01-19-00049-CV
03-10-2020
Tetra Technologies, Inc. v. David Alleman and Alleman Consulting, LLC
SECOND CONTINUING ORDER OF ABATEMENT Trial court case number: 2018-66742 Trial court: 268th District Court of Harris County
On June 13, 2019, appellees, David Alleman and Alleman Consulting, LLC (collectively "appellees"), filed a motion "to abate this appeal pending a trial court determination as to whether this case had been rendered moot by a binding compromise settlement agreement." See Mantas v. Fifth Court of Appeals, 925 S.W.2d 656, 658-59 (Tex. 1996) (orig. proceeding) (explaining if settlement dispute arises while underlying action is on appeal party seeking enforcement must file separate breach of contract action and appeal should be abated); Tony's Barbeque & Steakhouse, Inc. v. Three Points Invs., Inc., 527 S.W.3d 686, 689 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2017, no pet.) ("If the settlement dispute does not arise until the cause is on appeal, then claims for the breach or enforcement of the settlement agreement must be filed as a separate cause and the appeal abated pending resolution of the settlement-agreement dispute."). We granted appellees' motion and requested that appellees, no later than September 30, 2019, file a report advising the Court of the status of any trial court proceedings.
On September 11, 2019, appellees filed a "Status Report" advising the Court that they had filed suit against appellant "seeking enforcement of" the parties' purported post-judgment settlement agreement. See Mantas, 925 S.W.2d at 658-59; Tony's Barbeque, 527 S.W.3d at 689. Thus, on November 26, 2019, we directed appellees to file another report advising the Court of the status of any trial court proceedings no later than 60 days from the date of our order.
On January 14, 2020, appellees filed a "Second Status Report" advising the Court that proceedings in the trial court were on-going.
Accordingly, we direct appellees, no later than 90 days from the date of this order, to file another report advising the Court of the status of any trial court proceedings. If appellees do not respond as directed, the case may be reinstated on the Court's active docket and the appeal may proceed under the applicable Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure.
The appeal remains abated, treated as a closed case, and removed from this Court's active docket.
It is so ORDERED. Judge's signature: _/s/ Julie Countiss
[v] Acting individually [ ] Acting for the Court Date: March 10, 2020