From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tetelman v. Fulton

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Jan 13, 1939
170 Misc. 206 (N.Y. App. Term 1939)

Opinion

January 13, 1939.

Appeal from the Municipal Court of the City of New York, Borough of Bronx, Second District.

Montgomery, Peabody, Grace Derby [ Davies, Auerbach Cornell and Kenneth W. Greenawalt of counsel], for the appellants.

Harry C. Cohen, for the respondents.



The agreement of January 30, 1932, in reference to the payment of legal services contemplated only the payment of legal services in connection with the future management of the property and did not inure to the benefit of the plaintiffs. Under the circumstances the trial court was in error in granting judgment in favor of the plaintiffs.

Judgment reversed, with thirty dollars costs, and complaint dismissed on the merits, with costs.

All concur. Present — HAMMER, FRANKENTHALER and NOONAN, JJ.


Summaries of

Tetelman v. Fulton

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Jan 13, 1939
170 Misc. 206 (N.Y. App. Term 1939)
Case details for

Tetelman v. Fulton

Case Details

Full title:LOUIS L. TETELMAN and Another, Copartners, etc., Respondents, v. ROBERT C…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department

Date published: Jan 13, 1939

Citations

170 Misc. 206 (N.Y. App. Term 1939)
9 N.Y.S.2d 930