From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Testo v. Burden Iron Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jan 7, 1925
211 App. Div. 219 (N.Y. App. Div. 1925)

Opinion

January 7, 1925.

Appeal from State Industrial Board.

Hart Senior [ H.H. Breland of counsel], for the appellants.

Carl Sherman, Attorney-General [ E.C. Aiken, Deputy Attorney-General, of counsel], for the respondents.


The claimant, a puddler, working for the Burden Iron Company, which was a manufacturer of iron, has received an award fixing weekly compensation at seventeen dollars and eighteen cents. The one question presented on the appeal is the amount of this weekly compensation. The claimant had not worked in this employment, in which he was working at the time of the accident, substantially the whole of the year immediately preceding; the mills had been periodically closed; and there was no evidence given to show the average daily wage which an employee of the same class, working substantially the whole of the year immediately preceding in the same or similar employment, earned. The parties maintain, and we think properly, that the computation must be made under subdivision 3 of section 14 Work. Comp. of the Workmen's Compensation Law.

It is agreed, as the proof shows, that claimant, during the one hundred and seventeen weeks immediately preceding the time of the accident, had earned in this employment $2,816.71. (The Board had calculated that at $2,816.62; a quite immaterial difference.) During this period he actually worked seventy-seven weeks. One hundred and seventeen weeks are two and one-quarter years. He, therefore, worked an average of thirty-four and twenty-two one-hundredths weeks per year. Since he earned $2,816.71 in seventy-seven weeks, he earned while actually working $36.58 per week. His average annual earnings then were $1,251.85; that is, thirty-six and fifty-eight one-hundredths times thirty-four and twenty-two one-hundredths. This sum, under the evidence in this case, reasonably represents the annual earning capacity of the claimant "in the employment in which he was working at the time of the accident." ( McDonald v. Burden Iron Co., 206 App. Div. 571; Gruber v. Kramer Amusement Corp., 207 id. 564.) One-fifty-second of that sum (Workmen's Compensation Law, § 14, subd. 4) gives an average weekly wage of $24.07, two-thirds of which is $16.05, the weekly compensation to which he is entitled.

The award should, therefore, be modified by substituting therein sixteen dollars and five cents in place of seventeen dollars and eighteen cents and by changing the amount of the award to conform thereto, and as so modified affirmed, without costs.

Award modified by substituting therein sixteen dollars and five cents in place of seventeen dollars and eighteen cents, and by changing the amount of the award to conform thereto, and as so modified unanimously affirmed, without costs.


Summaries of

Testo v. Burden Iron Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jan 7, 1925
211 App. Div. 219 (N.Y. App. Div. 1925)
Case details for

Testo v. Burden Iron Co.

Case Details

Full title:Before STATE INDUSTRIAL BOARD, Respondent. CHARLES TESTO, Respondent, v…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jan 7, 1925

Citations

211 App. Div. 219 (N.Y. App. Div. 1925)
207 N.Y.S. 454

Citing Cases

Mtr. of Marshall v. Oswego Cty. Council Boy Scouts

In cases where subdivisions 1 and 2 of said section 14 cannot reasonably and fairly be applied, then…

Matter of Masten v. Rosoff Sand and Gravel Corp.

Award reversed and claim remitted, with costs against the State Industrial Board to abide the event, on the…