Opinion
Civil Action 21-5148-KSM
05-26-2022
ROSE MARIE M. TESTA, Plaintiff, v. BROOMALL OPERATING COMPANY, L.P., et al., Defendants.
ORDER
KAREN SPENCER MARSTON, J.
AND NOW, this 26th day of May, 2022, upon consideration of Defendant Broomall Operating Company, L.P.'s Motion to Strike Amended Complaint (Doc. No. 14), Plaintiff's Memorandum of Law in Opposition of Defendants' Motion to Strike Plaintiff's Amended Complaint (Doc. No. 22), Plaintiff's Motion to Remand (Doc. No. 23), Defendants' Response to Plaintiff's Motion to Remand (Doc. No. 29), and Plaintiff's Reply to Defendants' Response to Plaintiff's Motion to Remand (Doc. No. 30), it is ORDERED as follows:
1. Defendant Broomall Operating Company, L.P.'s Motion to Strike Amended Complaint (Doc. No. 14) is GRANTED IN PART. The claims against Vincent Rupert and Elizabeth Marasco-Kennedy are STRICKEN.
2. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to TERMINATE Vincent Rupert and Elizabeth Marasco-Kennedy as parties to this action.
3. Plaintiff's Motion to Remand (Doc. No. 23) is DENIED.
4. Defendants SHALL file responsive pleadings by June 9, 2022.
IT IS SO ORDERED.