From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tessier v. Waldron

Court of Appeals of Iowa.
May 25, 2016
885 N.W.2d 218 (Iowa Ct. App. 2016)

Summary

finding "[t]his case provides a textbook example of when deference to the district court's credibility finding is appropriate," where the appealing party claimed the petitioning party "was not credible" and the action had been filed simply to "gain an advantage" in a custody suit

Summary of this case from Clemens v. Clemens

Opinion

No. 15–1618.

05-25-2016

Ann TESSIER, Plaintiff–Appellee/Cross–Appellant, v. Jerry WALDRON Jr., Defendant–Appellant/Cross–Appellee.

Gary D. McKenrick of Cartee & McKenrick, P.C., Davenport, for appellant. David A. Millage of Gallagher, Millage & Gallagher, P.L.C., Bettendorf, for appellee.


DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Tessier v. Waldron

Court of Appeals of Iowa.
May 25, 2016
885 N.W.2d 218 (Iowa Ct. App. 2016)

finding "[t]his case provides a textbook example of when deference to the district court's credibility finding is appropriate," where the appealing party claimed the petitioning party "was not credible" and the action had been filed simply to "gain an advantage" in a custody suit

Summary of this case from Clemens v. Clemens
Case details for

Tessier v. Waldron

Case Details

Full title:Ann TESSIER, Plaintiff–Appellee/Cross–Appellant, v. Jerry WALDRON Jr.…

Court:Court of Appeals of Iowa.

Date published: May 25, 2016

Citations

885 N.W.2d 218 (Iowa Ct. App. 2016)

Citing Cases

Clemens v. Clemens

We find the evidence was sufficient to justify the district court's issuance of a final domestic abuse…