From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tesseron, Ltd. v. R.R. Donnelley Sons Co.

United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division
Aug 8, 2008
CASE NO. 1:06CV2909 (N.D. Ohio Aug. 8, 2008)

Opinion

CASE NO. 1:06CV2909.

August 8, 2008


ORDER


While the Court is not foreclosing the construction of additional claims, for purposes of the August 20, 2008 Markman hearing, and in order to maximize the efficient and expeditious resolution of this case, the Court will only entertain the submission of fifteen claims requiring construction.

On or before August 18, 2008, the parties shall meet and confer, and shall designate, in a joint filing, those fifteen claims, reasonably required to be construed to support or defend either party's position regarding liability for patent infringement, upon which they agree (including those which overlap with the claims in Case No. 1:07CV2974 before Judge Kathleen O'Malley); and may proffer those upon which they disagree. The parties shall submit for the Court's construction fifteen claims which are outcome-determinative, i.e., which have the maximum impact upon the resolution of the captioned patent infringement case. In no event, at this juncture, will this Court construe more than a total of fifteen claims.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Tesseron, Ltd. v. R.R. Donnelley Sons Co.

United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division
Aug 8, 2008
CASE NO. 1:06CV2909 (N.D. Ohio Aug. 8, 2008)
Case details for

Tesseron, Ltd. v. R.R. Donnelley Sons Co.

Case Details

Full title:TESSERON, LTD., Plaintiff, v. R.R. DONNELLEY SONS CO., Defendant

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division

Date published: Aug 8, 2008

Citations

CASE NO. 1:06CV2909 (N.D. Ohio Aug. 8, 2008)