Opinion
June 10, 1996
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Robbins, J.).
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
Contrary to the husband's contention, the court's award of sole custody of the parties' child to the wife was proper as the parties were unable to cooperate on matters concerning the child (see, Matter of Laura A.K. v. Timothy M., 204 A.D.2d 325).
Further, the court properly attributed and imputed to the husband moneys received from his parents (see, Domestic Relations Law § 240 [1-b] [b] [5] [iv] [D]; Lapkin v. Lapkin, 208 A.D.2d 474) and properly directed him to pay for 61% of the child's unreimbursed medical expenses (see, Domestic Relations Law § 240 [1-b] [c] [5]).
The husband's remaining contentions are without merit. Rosenblatt, J.P., Ritter, Copertino and Santucci, JJ., concur.