From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Terry v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, Dallas
Jun 30, 2010
No. 05-09-00988-CR (Tex. App. Jun. 30, 2010)

Opinion

No. 05-09-00988-CR

Opinion issued June 30, 2010. DO NOT PUBLISH. Tex. R. App. P. 47

On Appeal from the 194th Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas, Trial Court Cause No. F08-57704-HM.

Before Justices MORRIS, MOSELEY, and LANG.


MEMORANDUM OPINION


In this case, a jury convicted Kendrall Deshun Terry of aggravated sexual assault of a child younger than six years of age. See Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 22.021(a)(1)(B)(i), (f)(1) (Vernon Supp. 2009). On appeal, appellant's attorney filed a brief in which she concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). The brief presents a professional evaluation of the record showing why, in effect, there are no arguable grounds to advance. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 811 (Tex. Crim. App. [Panel Op.] 1978). Counsel delivered a copy of the brief to appellant. We advised appellant of his right to file a pro se response, but he did not file a pro se response. We have reviewed the record and counsel's brief. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). We agree the appeal is frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal. We affirm the trial court's judgment.


Summaries of

Terry v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, Dallas
Jun 30, 2010
No. 05-09-00988-CR (Tex. App. Jun. 30, 2010)
Case details for

Terry v. State

Case Details

Full title:KENDRALL DESHUN TERRY, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, Dallas

Date published: Jun 30, 2010

Citations

No. 05-09-00988-CR (Tex. App. Jun. 30, 2010)