Opinion
Case No. 11:05244 JCS
11-22-2011
PATRICIA TERRY, MARQUINITA TERRY, and TAANYKA TERRY, Plaintiffs, v. BEIERSDORF, INC., a Delaware Corporation and DOES 1-10, inclusive Defendant
KIRTLAND & PACKARD LLP BEHRAM V. PAREKH Attorneys for Plaintiffs SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP SAMUEL R. MILLER Attorneys for Beiersdorff
Samuel R. Miller (SBN 66871)
Ryan M. Sandrock (SBN 251781)
SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP
T. Robert Scarborough (Pro Hac Vice To Be Submitted)
SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP
Attorneys For Defendant
Beiersdorf, Inc.
STIPULATION AND
[PROPOSED] ORDER PURSUANT TO
LOCAL RULE 6-1 REGARDING TIME
TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE
RESPOND
WHEREAS Plaintiffs served the above-captioned lawsuit on Defendant Beiersdorf, Inc. ("Beiersdorf" or "Defendant") on November 3, 2011 (the "Complaint");
WHEREAS the time for Defendant to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint is currently November 28, 2011;
WHEREAS Plaintiffs and Defendant have reached an agreement, pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-1, to extend the time within which Defendant must answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint to January 11, 2012.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and among the undersigned counsel, on behalf of their respective clients, that Defendant will have until January 11, 2012 to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint.
IT IS SO STIPULATED:
KIRTLAND & PACKARD LLP
BEHRAM V. PAREKH
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP
SAMUEL R. MILLER
Attorneys for Beiersdorff
Pursuant to General Order 45, Part X-B, the filer attests that concurrence in the filing of this documents has been obtained from Behram V. Parekh and Samuel R. Miller.
[PROPOSED] ORDER
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
Judge Joseph C. Spero