Cf. Cheatham v. Cheatham, 537 So.2d 435, 438 (Miss.1988) (discussing that a long marriage is one of the factors to consider when determining whether to award lump-sum alimony); Terrell v. Terrell, 133 So.3d 833, 839–40 (¶¶ 19–20) (Miss.Ct.App.2013) (affirming the award of lump-sum alimony and refusal of periodic alimony in a case involving a twenty-three-year marriage where the wife lacked a separate income and quit working to care for the household).¶ 34. The chancellor also looked at the parties' standard of living during their marriage and found that Marketa's “standard of living will have to change considerably as she will be ... required to work in order to make a living.