From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Terrell v. Sisto

United States District Court, E.D. California
May 23, 2007
No. CIV S-07-0251-GEB-CMK-P (E.D. Cal. May. 23, 2007)

Opinion

No. CIV S-07-0251-GEB-CMK-P.

May 23, 2007


ORDER


Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner has requested the appointment of counsel (Doc. 14). There currently exists no absolute right to appointment of counsel in habeas proceedings. See Nevius v. Sumner, 105 F.3d 453, 460 (9th Cir. 1996). However, 18 U.S.C. § 3006A authorizes the appointment of counsel at any stage of the case "if the interests of justice so require." See Rule 8(c), Fed.R. Governing § 2254 Cases. In the present case, the court does not find that the interests of justice would be served by the appointment of counsel.

IT IS ORDERED that petitioner's motion is denied.


Summaries of

Terrell v. Sisto

United States District Court, E.D. California
May 23, 2007
No. CIV S-07-0251-GEB-CMK-P (E.D. Cal. May. 23, 2007)
Case details for

Terrell v. Sisto

Case Details

Full title:HERMAN TERRELL, Petitioner, v. D.K. SISTO, et al., Respondents

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: May 23, 2007

Citations

No. CIV S-07-0251-GEB-CMK-P (E.D. Cal. May. 23, 2007)