From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Terrell et al. v. State

Criminal Court of Appeals of Oklahoma
Feb 6, 1911
113 P. 223 (Okla. Crim. App. 1911)

Opinion

No. 348.

Opinion Filed February 6, 1911.

(Syllabus by the Court.)

APPEAL — Record — Failure to File Case-Made in Time. Where the case-made is not filed within the time allowed by the judge who presided at the trial, such case-made will be stricken from the record.

Appeal from Carter County Court; I.R. Mason, Judge.

Bob Terrell and another were convicted of violating the prohibitory liquor law, and they appeal. Affirmed, with directions.

William Pfieffer, for appellants.

Smith C. Matson, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.


Judgment in this case was pronounced on the 15th day of July, 1909, and the defendants were granted by the court 40 days within which to prepare and serve a case-made, which time expired on the 24th day of August, 1909. On the 28th day of August, 1909, the defendants served their case-made upon the county attorney of Carter county. As this case-made was served after the expiration of the time prescribed by the trial court, we cannot consider the case-made, and it must be stricken from the record. See Durant v. State, 3 Okla. Cr. 447, 106 P. 651.

The information in this case is in due form. There are no material errors in the instructions of the court, and the judgment is in strict conformity with the law. The conviction of the appellants is therefore affirmed, with directions to the county court of Carter county to proceed with the execution of the judgment.

ARMSTRONG and DOYLE, JUDGES, concur.


Summaries of

Terrell et al. v. State

Criminal Court of Appeals of Oklahoma
Feb 6, 1911
113 P. 223 (Okla. Crim. App. 1911)
Case details for

Terrell et al. v. State

Case Details

Full title:BOB TERRELL et al. v. STATE

Court:Criminal Court of Appeals of Oklahoma

Date published: Feb 6, 1911

Citations

113 P. 223 (Okla. Crim. App. 1911)
113 P. 223

Citing Cases

Van Tassel v. Cheyenne

This view would to some extent at least harmonize what we have above called the rules of common law, and the…

Clasby v. State

The matters complained of were not fundamental. The amount of liquor alleged to have been in possession of…