From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bishop v. Dep't of Corr. Dir.

Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
May 1, 2018
SC: 154693 (Mich. May. 1, 2018)

Opinion

SC: 154693

05-01-2018

TERRELL ALBERT BISHOP, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS DIRECTOR and DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Defendants-Appellees.


Order

154693 & (25) Stephen J. Markman, Chief Justice Brian K. Zahra Bridget M. McCormack David F. Viviano Richard H. Bernstein Kurtis T. Wilder Elizabeth T. Clement, Justices COA: 333757

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 22, 2016 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. The motion for appointment of counsel is DENIED.

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

May 1, 2018

/s/_________

Clerk


Summaries of

Bishop v. Dep't of Corr. Dir.

Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
May 1, 2018
SC: 154693 (Mich. May. 1, 2018)
Case details for

Bishop v. Dep't of Corr. Dir.

Case Details

Full title:TERRELL ALBERT BISHOP, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS…

Court:Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Date published: May 1, 2018

Citations

SC: 154693 (Mich. May. 1, 2018)