From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

TERNIUM INTL. U.S.A. CORP. v. CONSOLIDATED SYST

United States District Court, N.D. Texas, Dallas Division
Mar 25, 2009
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:08-CV-0816-G ECF (N.D. Tex. Mar. 25, 2009)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:08-CV-0816-G ECF.

March 25, 2009


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER


Before the court is the motion of the plaintiff, Ternium International U.S.A. Corp. ("Ternium" or "the plaintiff"), to dismiss two counterclaims asserted by the defendant, Consolidated Systems, Inc. ("CSI"). The court has already dismissed three of the defendant's counterclaims against Ternium after concluding that Texas law, rather than South Carolina law, governs this dispute. The three counterclaims the court has already dismissed were based entirely on South Carolina law, which does not apply here.

After filing the original counterclaims, the defendant then filed an amended counterclaim, asserting three new causes of action: (1) breach of express warranty, (2) breach of the implied warranty of merchantability and (3) breach of the implied warranty of fitness for a particular purpose. Defendant Consolidated Systems, Inc.'s Amended Counterclaims Against Plaintiff Ternium International U.S.A. Corp. ¶¶ 70-86. CSI expressly bases two of these new claims — breach of the implied warranty of merchantability and breach of the implied warranty of fitness for a particular purpose — on South Carolina law. Id. at ¶¶ 76, 82. Because, as the court has already ruled, Texas law rather than South Carolina law applies, Ternium's motion to dismiss these two claims is GRANTED. SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

TERNIUM INTL. U.S.A. CORP. v. CONSOLIDATED SYST

United States District Court, N.D. Texas, Dallas Division
Mar 25, 2009
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:08-CV-0816-G ECF (N.D. Tex. Mar. 25, 2009)
Case details for

TERNIUM INTL. U.S.A. CORP. v. CONSOLIDATED SYST

Case Details

Full title:TERNIUM INTERNATIONAL U.S.A. CORP., Plaintiff/Counter Defendant, v…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Texas, Dallas Division

Date published: Mar 25, 2009

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:08-CV-0816-G ECF (N.D. Tex. Mar. 25, 2009)

Citing Cases

Leighty v. Stone Truck Line Inc.

See id. Nonetheless, this factor does not weigh against transferring; the Court finds it neutral. See…

BNSF Railway Co. v. OOCL (USA), Inc.

Thus, this factor does not favor transfer. Cf. Centre One v. Vonage Holdings Corp., No. 6:08CV467, 2009 WL…