From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Termotto v. Brooklyn and Queens Transit Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 17, 1938
254 App. Div. 893 (N.Y. App. Div. 1938)

Opinion

June 17, 1938.

Present — Lazansky, P.J., Davis, Johnston, Adel and Close, JJ.


In an action to recover damages for personal injuries the defendant admitted liability but contended that the injuries received were in fact slight. The principal injury complained of was a defect in field vision of the right eye, claimed to be a result of the accident, which was not apparently discovered until the morning of the trial. The jury appear to have rejected the evidence on this subject and rendered a verdict for the injured plaintiff in the sum of $200 and for the father, for medical expenses and loss of services, in the sum of fifty dollars. The plaintiffs, in appealing, claim that the verdict in favor of the injured plaintiff was inadequate. Judgment, in so far as appeal is taken therefrom, and order denying new trial, unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion.


Summaries of

Termotto v. Brooklyn and Queens Transit Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 17, 1938
254 App. Div. 893 (N.Y. App. Div. 1938)
Case details for

Termotto v. Brooklyn and Queens Transit Corp.

Case Details

Full title:SAVERIO TERMOTTO and BENNIE TERMOTTO, Appellants, v. BROOKLYN AND QUEENS…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 17, 1938

Citations

254 App. Div. 893 (N.Y. App. Div. 1938)