From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tercero v. Soto

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California
Jun 15, 2015
SACV 14-0255-FMO (JEM) (C.D. Cal. Jun. 15, 2015)

Opinion

          Juan Carlos Tercero, Petitioner, Pro se, Lancaster, CA.

          For J. Soto, Warden, Defendant: David Delgado-Rucci, CAAG - Office of the Attorney General, California Department of Justice, San Diego, CA.


          ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

          FERNANDO M. OLGUIN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

         Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636, the Court has reviewed the pleadings, the records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. No Objections to the Report and Recommendation have been filed within the time allowed for Objections. The Court accepts the findings and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.

         IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: (1) the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is denied; and (2) Judgment shall be entered dismissing the action with prejudice.

         JUDGMENT

         In accordance with the Order Accepting Findings and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge filed concurrently herewith, IT IS HEREBY ADJUDGED that the action is dismissed with prejudice.


Summaries of

Tercero v. Soto

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California
Jun 15, 2015
SACV 14-0255-FMO (JEM) (C.D. Cal. Jun. 15, 2015)
Case details for

Tercero v. Soto

Case Details

Full title:JUAN CARLOS TERCERO, Petitioner, v. J. SOTO, Warden, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California

Date published: Jun 15, 2015

Citations

SACV 14-0255-FMO (JEM) (C.D. Cal. Jun. 15, 2015)