From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Terantino v. Fortson

United States District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania
May 6, 2022
Civil Action 1:21-CV-1248 (M.D. Pa. May. 6, 2022)

Opinion

Civil Action 1:21-CV-1248

05-06-2022

EDWARD TERANTINO, Plaintiff v. FAWN FORTSON, ROBERT LYNCH, PAULA PRICE, KEVIN KAUFFMAN, and JOHN WETZEL, Defendants


ORDER

Christopher C. Conner, United States District Judge

AND NOW, this 6th day of May, 2022, upon consideration of defendants' motions (Docs. 14, 20) to dismiss pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6), and for the reasons set forth in the accompanying memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. The DOC defendants' motion (Doc. 14) to dismiss is GRANTED in its entirety.

2. Defendant Fortson's motion (Doc. 20) to dismiss is DENIED.

3. Terantino, if desired, may file an amended complaint that addresses the deficiencies identified in the accompanying memorandum within 21 days of the date of this order, or by May 27, 2022. If no amended complaint is timely filed, this case will proceed against Fortson only.

4. Defendant Fortson may renew her challenge regarding failure to exhaust administrative remedies via a motion for summary judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56 and Local Rule of Court 56.1.


Summaries of

Terantino v. Fortson

United States District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania
May 6, 2022
Civil Action 1:21-CV-1248 (M.D. Pa. May. 6, 2022)
Case details for

Terantino v. Fortson

Case Details

Full title:EDWARD TERANTINO, Plaintiff v. FAWN FORTSON, ROBERT LYNCH, PAULA PRICE…

Court:United States District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania

Date published: May 6, 2022

Citations

Civil Action 1:21-CV-1248 (M.D. Pa. May. 6, 2022)