Opinion
No. B268298.
12-13-2016
SCOTT J. TEPPER, et al., Defendants and Respondents. SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. PATRICK FLANNERY, et al., Defendants and Appellants
[Modification of opinion (5 Cal.App.5th 476, ___ Cal.Rptr.3d ___), upon denial of rehearing.]
THE COURT: — IT IS ORDERED that the opinion filed on November 14, 2016, is modified as follows:
On page 16 [5 Cal.App.5th 488, advance report, 3d par., lines 3-7], the second sentence of the first full paragraph reads: "Judge Wiley noted his prior January 23, 2013 order in the Sesnon Fire Case that the court in the Palimony Case `would determine the ownership split between Murray and Flannery' and adopted the finding from the Palimony Case to award Flannery $1,225,000." The sentence should be replaced with: "Judge Wiley noted his prior January 23, 2013 order in the Sesnon Fire Case that the court in the Palimony Case `would determine the ownership split between Murray and Flannery' and adopted the finding from the Palimony Case to award Murray $1,225,000."
On page 29 [5 Cal.App.5th 496, advance report, 2d par., lines 3-6], the second sentence of the first full paragraph reads: "This argument is misguided because Flannery's answer to the interpleader complaint was sufficient to place the existence, value, and enforceability of his lien at issue as against Flannery." The sentence should be replaced with: "This argument is misguided because Tepper's answer to the interpleader complaint was sufficient to place the existence, value, and enforceability of his lien at issue as against Flannery."
The petition for rehearing is denied.