From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tepersak v. Norton

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 7, 1966
26 A.D.2d 940 (N.Y. App. Div. 1966)

Opinion

November 7, 1966


In an action by the owners of certain real property, who had engaged defendant surveyors to survey and monument the property, to recover damages for negligence in surveying and monumenting the property, defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, entered November 6, 1964, which denied their motion for summary judgment. Order affirmed, without costs. In our opinion, issues requiring trial were raised by the affidavits. As the complaint is amendable, summary judgment was properly denied (see Curry v. MacKenzie, 239 N.Y. 267, 272; Rock v. Fidelity Cas. Co., 16 A.D.2d 823). Christ, Acting P.J., Hill, Rabin, Hopkins and Benjamin, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Tepersak v. Norton

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 7, 1966
26 A.D.2d 940 (N.Y. App. Div. 1966)
Case details for

Tepersak v. Norton

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM TEPERSAK et al., Respondents, v. RALPH T. NORTON et al., Doing…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 7, 1966

Citations

26 A.D.2d 940 (N.Y. App. Div. 1966)