Opinion
3:23-CV-423-RJC-DCK
01-03-2024
MAWULE TEPE, Plaintiff, v. CLIFTON L. CORKER, et al., Defendants.
ORDER
DAVID C. KEESLER, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE.
THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE COURT on Plaintiff's “Motion To Set And/Or Motion For Scheduling Order And Motion For Pretrial Conference And Memorandum In Support” (Document No. 120) filed January 2, 2024. This motion has been referred to the undersigned Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), and immediate review is appropriate. Having carefully considered the motion and the record, the undersigned will deny the motion without prejudice.
By the instant motion, Plaintiff asks the Court to enter “an Order setting this action for trial, and in addition or in the alternative, establishing a scheduling Order.” (Document No. 120, p. 1). Notably, the Honorable Robert J. Conrad, Jr. entered an Order on December 15, 2023 that dismissed the Defendants' Motions to Dismiss (Document Nos. 4, 32, 37, 66, 74, 94, 100, and 102) and directed that Plaintiff make a filing within fourteen (14) days “explaining why he believes the Court should not impose [a] pre-filing review system.” (Document No. 115, p. 4).
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that Plaintiff's “Motion To Set And/Or Motion For Scheduling order And Motion For Pretrial Conference And Memorandum In Support” (Document No. 120) is DENIED without prejudice.
SO ORDERED.