From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tennyson v. Carpenter

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
May 1, 2013
Civil Action No. 13-cv-00648-BNB (D. Colo. May. 1, 2013)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 13-cv-00648-BNB

05-01-2013

AUDREY LEE TENNYSON, Plaintiff, v. MATTHEW CARPENTER, Chief of Unit Managers, ROBERT SPARKS, Unit Manager, "THE SUPERIORS," Identities Not Yet Known, VANCE EVERETT, K.C.C.C. Warden, KIT CARSON CORRECTIONAL CENTER, TOM CLEMENTS, C.D.O.C. Executive Director, and COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Individually and In Their Official Capacities, Defendants.


ORDER OVERRULING OBJECTION

This matter is before the Court on the objection titled "Objections/Motion for Reconsideration of Orders [sic] Dated 4/2/2013" filed pro se on April 17, 2013, by Plaintiff, Audrey Lee Tennyson. Mr. Tennyson objects to Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland's order of April 2, 2013 (ECF No. 10), directing him to file an amended prisoner complaint. Mr. Tennyson is a prisoner in the custody of the Colorado Department of Corrections who currently is incarcerated at the Kit Carson Correctional Center in Burlington, Colorado.

In the April 2 order, Magistrate Judge Boland explained how the prisoner complaint failed to comply with the pleading requirements of Rule 8 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and elaborated on how to file an amended complaint that would comply. In his objection, Mr. Tennyson disagrees with Magistrate Judge Boland's suggestions.

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A) a judge may reconsider any pretrial matter designated to a magistrate judge to hear and determine where it has been shown that the magistrate judge's order is clearly erroneous or contrary to law. The Court has reviewed the file and finds that Magistrate Judge Boland's order directing Mr. Tennyson to file an amended prisoner complaint is not clearly erroneous or contrary to law.

Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that the objection titled "Objections/Motion for Reconsideration of Orders [sic] Dated 4/2/2013" filed pro se on April 17, 2013, by Plaintiff, Audrey Lee Tennyson, is overruled. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that Mr. Tennyson will be allowed thirty (30) days from the date of this order in which to file an amended prisoner complaint that complies with the order of April 2, 2013. Failure to do so within the time allowed will result in the dismissal of the instant action.

DATED at Denver, Colorado, this 1st day of May, 2013.

BY THE COURT:

______________________________

LEWIS T. BABCOCK, Senior Judge

United States District Court


Summaries of

Tennyson v. Carpenter

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
May 1, 2013
Civil Action No. 13-cv-00648-BNB (D. Colo. May. 1, 2013)
Case details for

Tennyson v. Carpenter

Case Details

Full title:AUDREY LEE TENNYSON, Plaintiff, v. MATTHEW CARPENTER, Chief of Unit…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: May 1, 2013

Citations

Civil Action No. 13-cv-00648-BNB (D. Colo. May. 1, 2013)