From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tennille v. Marberry

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Oct 10, 2008
Civil Action No. 07-218 Erie (W.D. Pa. Oct. 10, 2008)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 07-218 Erie.

October 10, 2008


MEMORANDUM ORDER


This petition for writ of habeas corpus was received by the Clerk of Court on August 17, 2007 and was referred to Chief United States Magistrate Judge Susan Paradise Baxter for report and recommendation in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and Rules 72.1.3 and 72.1.4 of the Local Rules for Magistrates.

The Chief Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, entered orally on the record on July 22, 2008 ([21] and [22]), recommends that the Petitioner's Motion [20] for Preventive Injunction be denied. The parties were allowed ten (10) days from the date of service in which to file objections. Petitioner has filed no objections to Chief Magistrate Judge Baxter's Report and Recommendation. After de novo review of the petition and documents in the case, together with the Report and Recommendation, the following order is entered:

AND NOW, this 10th day of October, 2008;

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Petitioner's Motion [20] for Preventive Injunction be, and hereby is, DENIED.

The Report and Recommendation of Chief Magistrate Judge Baxter, orally entered on the record on July 22, 2008 ([21] and [22]), is adopted as the opinion of the Court.


Summaries of

Tennille v. Marberry

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Oct 10, 2008
Civil Action No. 07-218 Erie (W.D. Pa. Oct. 10, 2008)
Case details for

Tennille v. Marberry

Case Details

Full title:LAWRENCE KEMP TENNILLE, II Petitioner, v. HELEN J. MARBERRY, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Oct 10, 2008

Citations

Civil Action No. 07-218 Erie (W.D. Pa. Oct. 10, 2008)