From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tennard v. Neuschmid

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 4, 2021
Case No. 5:19-cv-01186-GW (AFM) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 4, 2021)

Opinion

Case No. 5:19-cv-01186-GW (AFM)

03-04-2021

THOMAS RAYMILLIER TENNARD, JR., Petitioner, v. ROBERT NEUSCHMID, Warden, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, records on file and the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge. The time for filing Objections to the Report and Recommendation has passed and Objections have not been received. The Court accepts the findings and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.

IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED that Judgment be entered (1) denying Petitioner's motion for reconsideration as moot; (2) denying Petitioner's request for an evidentiary hearing; and (3) denying the petition and dismissing the action with prejudice. DATED: March 4, 2021

/s/_________

GEORGE H. WU

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Tennard v. Neuschmid

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 4, 2021
Case No. 5:19-cv-01186-GW (AFM) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 4, 2021)
Case details for

Tennard v. Neuschmid

Case Details

Full title:THOMAS RAYMILLIER TENNARD, JR., Petitioner, v. ROBERT NEUSCHMID, Warden…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Mar 4, 2021

Citations

Case No. 5:19-cv-01186-GW (AFM) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 4, 2021)