From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tenenbaum v. Jackson Surrey Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 3, 1985
111 A.D.2d 752 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Opinion

June 3, 1985


Order confirmed and proceeding dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

The determination by the State Division of Human Rights is supported by substantial evidence on the record considered as a whole and was not arbitrary, capricious or an abuse of discretion ( see, Executive Law § 298; State Off. of Drug Abuse Servs. v State Human Rights Appeal Bd., 48 N.Y.2d 276, 284; Matter of Board of Educ. v. New York State Div. of Human Rights [ Burns], 56 N.Y.2d 257, 261; Matter of Hickman v. Roslyn Air Natl. Guard, 99 A.D.2d 837). Mangano, J.P., Gibbons, Bracken and Kunzeman, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Tenenbaum v. Jackson Surrey Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 3, 1985
111 A.D.2d 752 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)
Case details for

Tenenbaum v. Jackson Surrey Co.

Case Details

Full title:LOUIS TENENBAUM, Petitioner, v. JACKSON SURREY CO. et al., Respondents

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 3, 1985

Citations

111 A.D.2d 752 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)