From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tendler v. Basiliko

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit
Mar 29, 1956
231 F.2d 516 (D.C. Cir. 1956)

Opinion

No. 12899.

Argued February 15, 1956.

Decided March 29, 1956.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia; Alexander Holtzoff, Judge.

Mr. Max Tendler, Washington, D.C., appellant pro se.

Mr. J. Zitomer, Washington, D.C., filed a brief for appellant.

Mr. Harry L. Ryan, Jr., Washington, D.C., with whom Mr. Roger J. Whiteford, Washington, D.C., was on the brief, for appellees Basiliko.

Before WILBUR K. MILLER, WASHINGTON and DANAHER, Circuit Judges.


This appeal, in essence, represents an effort by appellant to obtain relief from the terms of agreements and stipulations which he made as a result of his involvement in an unfortunate real estate transaction. The questions presented were carefully considered at hearings held before three Judges of the District Court on successive motions of the parties. All concluded that appellant was not entitled to relief. We agree. The judgment appealed from will be

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Tendler v. Basiliko

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit
Mar 29, 1956
231 F.2d 516 (D.C. Cir. 1956)
Case details for

Tendler v. Basiliko

Case Details

Full title:Max TENDLER, Appellant, v. Nick BASILIKO et al., Appellees

Court:United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit

Date published: Mar 29, 1956

Citations

231 F.2d 516 (D.C. Cir. 1956)
97 U.S. App. D.C. 357

Citing Cases

T.V.T. Corporation v. Basiliko

Defendants' motions for summary judgment were based essentially on two grounds: (1) the action was barred by…