§

Tendeka, Inc. v. Glover

CIVIL ACTION NO. H-13-1764 (S.D. Tex. Mar. 12, 2014)
Tendeka, Inc. v. Glover

12 Citing cases

  1. Harbour v. Heyl Truck Lines Inc.

    Civil Action 3:24-CV-0183-D (N.D. Tex. Mar. 27, 2024)

    Rather, “the district court may receive any combination of the recognized methods of discovery, including affidavits, interrogatories, and depositions to assist it in the jurisdictional analysis.” Tendeka, Inc. v. Glover, 2014 WL 978308, at *3 (S.D. Tex. Mar. 12, 2014) (Rosenthal, J.) (internal quotation marks omitted).

  2. MJ Connections, Inc. v. Pincus Law Grp.

    Civil Action 3:23-CV-1616-D (N.D. Tex. Oct. 20, 2023)

    Rather, “the district court may receive any combination of the recognized methods of discovery, including affidavits, interrogatories, and depositions to assist it in the jurisdictional analysis.” Tendeka, Inc. v. Glover, 2014 WL 978308, at *3 (S.D. Tex. Mar. 12, 2014) (Rosenthal, J.) (internal quotations omitted).

  3. Sedillo v. Team Techs.

    Civil Action No. 3:20-CV-1628-D (N.D. Tex. Nov. 23, 2020)   Cited 1 times

    Rather, "the district court may receive any combination of the recognized methods of discovery, including affidavits, interrogatories, and depositions to assist it in the jurisdictional analysis." Tendeka, Inc. v. Glover, 2014 WL 978308, at *3 (S.D. Tex. Mar. 12, 2014) (Rosenthal, J.) (internal quotation marks omitted). III

  4. Maiden Biosciences, Inc. v. MPM Med., Inc.

    Civil Action No. 3:18-CV-1354-D (N.D. Tex. Nov. 14, 2019)   Cited 3 times
    Denying leave to amend where movant "fail[ed] to mention ... Rule 16(b) or good cause"

    Rather, "the district court may receive any combination of the recognized methods of discovery, including affidavits, interrogatories, and depositions to assist it in the jurisdictional analysis." Tendeka, Inc. v. Glover, 2014 WL 978308, at *3 (S.D. Tex. Mar. 12, 2014) (Rosenthal, J.) (internal quotation marks omitted). IV

  5. Shippitsa Ltd. v. Slack

    Civil Action No. 3:18-CV-1036-D (N.D. Tex. Jul. 23, 2019)   Cited 7 times

    Rather, "the district court may receive any combination of the recognized methods of discovery, including affidavits, interrogatories, and depositions to assist it in the jurisdictional analysis." Tendeka, Inc. v. Glover, 2014 WL 978308, at *3 (S.D. Tex. Mar. 12, 2014) (Rosenthal, J.) (internal quotation marks omitted). B

  6. Shippitsa Ltd. v. Slack

    Civil Action No. 3:18-CV-1036-D (N.D. Tex. Jun. 5, 2019)   Cited 4 times
    Rejecting argument that defendant's webpage automatically sending redirect instructions to all visitors evinced purposeful conduct, noting that "the kinds of interactive features that the Zippo test does take into account—such as the defendant's processing online order forms and allowing sales associates to exchange messages with visitors . . . require subsequent, purposeful action by the defendant or its agents."

    Rather, "the district court may receive any combination of the recognized methods of discovery, including affidavits, interrogatories, and depositions to assist it in the jurisdictional analysis." Tendeka, Inc. v. Glover, 2014 WL 978308, at *3 (S.D. Tex. Mar. 12, 2014) (Rosenthal, J.) (internal quotations omitted). 2

  7. Basic Capital Mgmt., Inc. v. Dynex Capital, Inc.

    Civil Action No. 3:17-CV-1147-D (N.D. Tex. Jan. 25, 2019)   Cited 4 times
    Considering the futility of amendment “in the context of pleading personal jurisdiction”

    Rather, "the district court may receive any combination of the recognized methods of discovery, including affidavits, interrogatories, and depositions to assist it in the jurisdictional analysis." Tendeka, Inc. v. Glover, 2014 WL 978308, at *3 (S.D. Tex. Mar. 12, 2014) (Rosenthal, J.) (internal quotations omitted). "The district court usually resolves the jurisdictional issue without conducting a hearing."

  8. Shippitsa Ltd. v. Slack

    Civil Action No. 3:18-CV-1036-D (N.D. Tex. Jan. 22, 2019)   Cited 10 times
    Denying leave to amend based on the plaintiff's failure to cure the lack of personal jurisdiction

    Rather, "the district court may receive any combination of the recognized methods of discovery, including affidavits, interrogatories, and depositions to assist it in the jurisdictional analysis." Tendeka, Inc. v. Glover, 2014 WL 978308, at *3 (S.D. Tex. Mar. 12, 2014) (Rosenthal, J.) (internal quotations omitted). B

  9. Spinsci Techs., LLC v. J Projects, LLC

    Civil Action No. 3:18-CV-0344-D (N.D. Tex. Sep. 7, 2018)   Cited 1 times

    Rather, "the district court may receive any combination of the recognized methods of discovery, including affidavits, interrogatories, and depositions to assist it in the jurisdictional analysis." Tendeka, Inc. v. Glover, 2014 WL 978308, at *3 (S.D. Tex. Mar. 12, 2014) (Rosenthal, J.) (internal quotations omitted). "The district court usually resolves the jurisdictional issue without conducting a hearing."

  10. Flowserve U.S. Inc. v. ITT Corp.

    No. 3:14-CV-1706-M (N.D. Tex. Dec. 22, 2014)

    Flowserve counters that, because it is headquartered in Irving, Texas and ITT is headquartered in New York, and the training was provided in the Netherlands, this forum still has a significant interest in resolving the controversy, or at least a more significant interest than does Russia. Accepting Flowserve's argument would require most litigation involving multinational corporations headquartered in the U.S. to be resolved in U.S. courts. Where the actors, property, and harm suffered are primarily connected to Russia, and not the United States, this forum has a minimal interest in resolving this dispute, even if the litigants are headquartered in the United States. Flowserve relies on Tendeka, Inc. v. Glover to argue that this forum has a strong interest in resolving this dispute because Flowserve's principal place of business is in Texas. No. H-13-1764, 2014 WL 978308, at *11 (S.D. Tex. Mar. 12, 2014) (Rosenthal, J.). However, in Tendeka, the litigants entered into a contract that called for litigation in Texas under Texas law.