From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

TenCate Advanced Armor U.S., Inc. v. Barrday Corp.

United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina, Charlotte Division
Sep 6, 2022
3:22-CV-347-RJC-DCK (W.D.N.C. Sep. 6, 2022)

Opinion

3:22-CV-347-RJC-DCK

09-06-2022

TENCATE ADVANCED ARMOR USA, INC., Plaintiff, v. BARRDAY CORP., Defendant.


ORDER

David C. Keesler United States Magistrate Judge

THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE COURT on the “Motion For Admission Pro Hac Vice and Affidavit” (Document No. 9) filed by Wade Leach, concerning Graham Stieglitz, on September 6, 2022. Graham Stieglitz seeks to appear as counsel pro hac vice for Plaintiff. Upon review and consideration of the motion, which was accompanied by submission of the necessary fee and information, the Court will grant the motion.

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that in accordance with Local Rule 83.1, the “Motion For Admission Pro Hac Vice and Affidavit” (Document No. 9) is GRANTED. Graham Stieglitz is hereby admitted pro hac vice to represent Plaintiff.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

TenCate Advanced Armor U.S., Inc. v. Barrday Corp.

United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina, Charlotte Division
Sep 6, 2022
3:22-CV-347-RJC-DCK (W.D.N.C. Sep. 6, 2022)
Case details for

TenCate Advanced Armor U.S., Inc. v. Barrday Corp.

Case Details

Full title:TENCATE ADVANCED ARMOR USA, INC., Plaintiff, v. BARRDAY CORP., Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina, Charlotte Division

Date published: Sep 6, 2022

Citations

3:22-CV-347-RJC-DCK (W.D.N.C. Sep. 6, 2022)