From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

TEMPERA v. LIDO SPA

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Apr 9, 1974
291 So. 2d 640 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1974)

Opinion

No. 73-506.

March 12, 1974. Rehearing Denied April 9, 1974.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Dade County, Harvie S. DuVal, J.

High, Stack, Davis Lazenby and Norman S. Segall, Miami, for appellants.

Preddy, Haddad, Kutner Hardy; Podhurst, Orseck Parks, Miami, for appellee.

Before BARKDULL, C.J., and PEARSON and CARROLL, JJ.


This is an appeal from a summary final judgment. In entering its judgment, the court specifically considered certain evidence and based its decision thereon. The judgment states as follows:

* * * * * *

"1. By agreement of counsel, the Court considered three photographs marked Plaintiff's exhibits for identification 1, 2 and 3; identified in the deposition of witness Koenig taken August 7, 1972, and attached to Plaintiff's copy of the deposition which was handed to the Court during the hearing."

* * * * * *

Having determined that the photographs considered by the court were not made a part of the record at any time and are not now before us, we affirm upon the authority of the rule stated in McEachin v. McEachin, Fla.App. 1963, 154 So.2d 894, 898. See Hollander v. Nolan Brown Motors, Inc., Fla.App. 1973, 272 So.2d 9.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

TEMPERA v. LIDO SPA

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Apr 9, 1974
291 So. 2d 640 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1974)
Case details for

TEMPERA v. LIDO SPA

Case Details

Full title:DOROTHY TEMPERA AND LOU TEMPERA, HER HUSBAND, APPELLANTS, v. LIDO SPA, A…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Apr 9, 1974

Citations

291 So. 2d 640 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1974)