From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

TemPay Inc. v. Biltres Staffing of Tampa Bay, LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION
Nov 21, 2013
Case No. 8:11-cv-2732-T-27AEP (M.D. Fla. Nov. 21, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 8:11-cv-2732-T-27AEP

11-21-2013

TEMPAY INC., Plaintiff, v. BILTRES STAFFING OF TAMPA BAY, LLC, OTTO BILTRES, CONSTANDINA I. BILTRES, and PFG LOANS, INC., Defendants.


ORDER

BEFORE THE COURT is Plaintiff Tempay, Inc.'s Motion to Tax Costs (Dkt. 144) and Supplemental Motion to Tax Costs (Dkt. 229). Defendants have not responded to either motion. Upon review of these filings, the assigned United States Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation (Dkt. 244) recommending that Plaintiff's request for costs be granted in part and denied in part. Neither party filed objections and the time in which to do so has passed. Upon consideration, the Report and Recommendation is adopted as the opinion of the Court and Plaintiff is awarded costs in the amount of $8,357.50.

A district court may accept, reject or modify a magistrate judge's report and recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). In the absence of specific objections, there is no requirement that factual findings be reviewed de novo, and the court may accept, reject or modify, in whole or in part, the findings and recommendations. § 636(b)(1)(C); Garvey v. Vaughn, 993 F.2d 776, 779 n.9 (11th Cir. 1993). Legal conclusions are reviewed de novo, even in the absence of an objection. See LeCroy v. McNeil, 397 Fed. Appx. 554, 556 (11th Cir. 2010) (citing United States v. Warren, 687 F.2d 347, 348 (11th Cir. 1982)); Cooper-Houston v. S. Ry. Co., 37 F.3d 603, 604 (11th Cir. 1994).

Accordingly,

1. The Report and Recommendation (Dkt. 224) is ADOPTED as the opinion of the Court for all purposes, including for appellate review.

2. Plaintiff Tempay, Inc.'s Motion to Tax Costs (Dkt. 144) and Supplemental Motion to Tax Costs (Dkt. 229) are GRANTED in part and DENIED in part to the extent that Plaintiff is awarded costs in the amount of:

Fees of the Clerk

$350.00

Fees for service of subpoenas

$2,425.00

Fees for Transcripts

$1,960.20

Copy Costs

$3,582.30

Other Costs

$40

TOTAL

$8,357.50


3. The Clerk is directed to tax costs against Defendants Biltres Staffing of Tampa Bay, LLC, Otto Biltres, and Constandina Biltres in the amount as set forth above and CLOSE the file.

____________

JAMES D. WHITTEMORE

United States District Judge
Copies to:
Counsel of Record


Summaries of

TemPay Inc. v. Biltres Staffing of Tampa Bay, LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION
Nov 21, 2013
Case No. 8:11-cv-2732-T-27AEP (M.D. Fla. Nov. 21, 2013)
Case details for

TemPay Inc. v. Biltres Staffing of Tampa Bay, LLC

Case Details

Full title:TEMPAY INC., Plaintiff, v. BILTRES STAFFING OF TAMPA BAY, LLC, OTTO…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION

Date published: Nov 21, 2013

Citations

Case No. 8:11-cv-2732-T-27AEP (M.D. Fla. Nov. 21, 2013)

Citing Cases

Thorkelson v. Marceno

Turning to the merits of the request, while the Undersigned acknowledges that costs attributable to discovery…

Taylor-Williams v. Rembert

"Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(d)(1) prescribes an award of costs for a prevailing party unless a…