From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Teman v. Doe

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jan 9, 2024
23-CV-1296 (ALC) (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 9, 2024)

Opinion

23-CV-1296 (ALC)

01-09-2024

ARI TEMAN, Plaintiff, v. DOES 1-10, GRANICUS, INC. and T-MOBILE USA, INC., Defendants.


ORDER

ANDREW L. CARTER, JR., United States District Judge:

On October 13, 2023, the Court ordered Plaintiff to show cause by October 27, 2023 as to why this action should not be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute the case pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b). ECF No. 32. Such showing was not made. Accordingly, this case is dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b). See LeSane v. Hall's Sec. Analyst, Inc., 239 F.3d 206, 209 (2d Cir. 2001) (“[I]t is unquestioned that Rule 41(b) also gives the district court authority to dismiss a plaintiff's case sua sponte for failure to prosecute . . .”).

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Teman v. Doe

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jan 9, 2024
23-CV-1296 (ALC) (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 9, 2024)
Case details for

Teman v. Doe

Case Details

Full title:ARI TEMAN, Plaintiff, v. DOES 1-10, GRANICUS, INC. and T-MOBILE USA, INC.…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Jan 9, 2024

Citations

23-CV-1296 (ALC) (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 9, 2024)