From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tello-Resendiz v. Barr

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
May 23, 2019
No. 17-72587 (9th Cir. May. 23, 2019)

Opinion

No. 17-72587

05-23-2019

JOSE TELLO-RESENDIZ, AKA Jose Resendiz Tello, Petitioner, v. WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General, Respondent.


NOT FOR PUBLICATION

Agency No. A088-894-044 MEMORANDUM On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals Before: THOMAS, Chief Judge, FRIEDLAND and BENNETT, Circuit Judges.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

Jose Tello-Resendiz, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' ("BIA") order denying his motion to reopen. We dismiss the petition for review.

We lack jurisdiction to review the BIA's denial of Tello-Resendiz's motion to reopen because the new evidence he presented concerns similar hardship grounds previously relied upon to support his application for cancellation of removal. See Garcia v. Holder, 621 F.3d 906, 911 (9th Cir. 2010) (this court's jurisdiction to review the BIA's denial of a motion to reopen is limited to cases in which petitioner presents new evidence that "is so distinct from that considered previously as to make the motion to reopen a request for new relief itself, rather than for reconsideration of a prior denial" (citation and internal quotation marks omitted)).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.


Summaries of

Tello-Resendiz v. Barr

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
May 23, 2019
No. 17-72587 (9th Cir. May. 23, 2019)
Case details for

Tello-Resendiz v. Barr

Case Details

Full title:JOSE TELLO-RESENDIZ, AKA Jose Resendiz Tello, Petitioner, v. WILLIAM P…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Date published: May 23, 2019

Citations

No. 17-72587 (9th Cir. May. 23, 2019)