Opinion
21-cv-10693
10-14-2022
DARRYL TELLIS, Plaintiff, v. UNKNOWN SUPERVISOR and UNKNOWN NURSE, Defendants.
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO AMEND COMPLAINT (ECF No. 16)
Hon. Matthew F. Leitman Judge
On March 29, 2021, while confined at the Oakland County Jail, Plaintiff Darryl Tellis filed this pro se civil-rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (See Compl., ECF No. 1.) Tellis did not pay the filing fee for a civil action or move to proceed without prepayment of the filing fee under 28 U.S.C. § 1915. On April 15, 2021, the Court ordered Tellis to correct this deficiency (the “Deficiency Order”). (See Deficiency Order, ECF No. 3.) Tellis never corrected the deficiency or moved to proceed without the prepayment of the filing fee. Accordingly, on April 21, 2022, the Court dismissed Tellis' Complaint without prejudice. (See Order, ECF No. 14.)
On October 13, 2022, Tellis filed a motion seeking permission to file an Amended Complaint. (See Mot., ECF No. 13.) But Tellis has still not paid the required filing fee or otherwise complied with the Deficiency Order. Tellis' motion for leave to file an Amended Complaint is DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.