From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Telfer v. Waddington

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nov 20, 2007
255 F. App'x 188 (9th Cir. 2007)

Opinion

No. 04-35822.

Submitted October 22, 2007.

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a)(2).

Filed November 20, 2007.

Wayne L. Telfer, Aberdeen, WA, pro se.

Donna H. Mullen, Esq., Office of the Washington Attorney General (Olympia) Criminal Justice Division, Olympia, WA, for Respondent-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington, Franklin D. Burgess, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CV-04-05130-FDB.

Before: B. FLETCHER, WARDLAW, and IKUTA, Circuit Judges.



MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.


Wayne L. Telfer, a former Washington state prisoner, appeals pro se from the district court's judgment dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petition. We dismiss the appeal as moot.

Telfer's petition challenges only his sentence and not his conviction. On August 4, 2005, Telfer was released from the jurisdiction of the Washington Department of Corrections. Accordingly, we conclude that this appeal is moot, because there is no case or controversy with respect to Telfer's completed sentence. See United States v. Palomba, 182 F.3d 1121, 1123 (9th Cir. 1999).

DISMISSED.


Summaries of

Telfer v. Waddington

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nov 20, 2007
255 F. App'x 188 (9th Cir. 2007)
Case details for

Telfer v. Waddington

Case Details

Full title:Wayne L. TELFER, Petitioner — Appellant, v. Doug WADDINGTON, Respondent …

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Nov 20, 2007

Citations

255 F. App'x 188 (9th Cir. 2007)

Citing Cases

United States v. De La Garza-Gonzalez

Because De La Garza-Gonzalez is only contesting the length of his incarceration and not any term of…