Summary
In Sprint Telephony PCS v. County of San Diego, ___ F.3d ___, 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 19316 (9th Cir. 2008) (filed September 11, 2008), the Ninth Circuit, en banc, overruled City of Auburn. Under the interpretation of § 253(a) set forth in Sprint Telephony, the City Regulations, on their face, are not preempted under 47 U.S.C. § 253(a).
Summary of this case from Nextg Networks of Ca. v. City Co. of San FranciscoOpinion
Nos. 05-56076, 05-56435.
May 14, 2008.
Daniel T. Pascucci, Nathan R. Hamler, Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky Popeo, P.C., San Diego, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee.
Thomas D. Bunton, County of San Diego Office of County Counsel, John Sansome, Office of County Counsel, San Diego, CA, for Defendants-Appellees-Cross-Appellants.
D.C. No. CV-03-1398-BTM.
ORDER
Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.
Judges McKeown and M. Smith are recused.