From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tejeda v. Muniz

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 20, 2018
Case No. CV 17-1780-JGB (JEM) (C.D. Cal. Jul. 20, 2018)

Opinion

Case No. CV 17-1780-JGB (JEM)

07-20-2018

JORGE TEJEDA, Petitioner, v. WILLIAM MUNIZ, Warden, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636, the Court has reviewed the pleadings, the records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Petitioner has filed Objections, and the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which Petitioner has objected. The Court accepts the findings and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.

IT IS ORDERED that: (1) the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is denied; and (2) Judgment shall be entered dismissing the action with prejudice. DATED: July 20, 2018

/s/_________

JESUS G. BERNAL

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Tejeda v. Muniz

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 20, 2018
Case No. CV 17-1780-JGB (JEM) (C.D. Cal. Jul. 20, 2018)
Case details for

Tejeda v. Muniz

Case Details

Full title:JORGE TEJEDA, Petitioner, v. WILLIAM MUNIZ, Warden, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jul 20, 2018

Citations

Case No. CV 17-1780-JGB (JEM) (C.D. Cal. Jul. 20, 2018)